• Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    Bernard Allen Goldbe… on One-State Solution: Options On…
    Judah Rosen on One-State Solution: Options On…
    Bernard Allen Goldbe… on After Israel
    Richard Robinson on Before Israel
    Judah Rosen on Before Israel
  • Top Posts

  • Search by Category

  • Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 11,379 hits
  • Pages

  • Twitter

  • Meta

Animal Farm: a White House Story

animal-farm-1
Or how I was forced by real, yet surreal events and frightening circumstances, to join the resistance once again. Either way, the message being written on the wall is very clear: Things are not normal in today’s America, following the election and its aftermath, and we shouldn’t pretend—though some good, and not so good people suggest we do—as if they are normal. But hold on a minute, let’s backtrack a bit here for the sake of clarity, and out of the need to bring you all up to speed, so that we can read from the same page. In short: learn how a bad joke became such a sad story.

In England, on August 17, 1945, George Orwell published his allegorical, dystopian novella: Animal Farm, a Fairy Story. In my library I still have the old Penguin Modern Classics edition, which I bought and read in London when I first arrived there for my studies (up above is the cover, as illustrated by Paul Hogarth). In the back cover, it says this in part: “The animals on a farm drive out their master and take over and administer the farm for themselves. The experiment is entirely successful, except for the unfortunate fact that someone has to take the deposed farmer’s place. Leadership devolves almost automatically upon the pigs, (naturally, H.D.) who are on a higher intellectual level than the rest of the animals. Unhappily their character is not equal to their intelligence, (get this? H.D.) and out of this fact springs the main development of the story.

You remember the rest of the story, don’t you? Or can find it out for yourself. Now Orwell is known to have written this book about the Russian Revolution in general, and Joseph Stalin in particular. He was a Democratic Socialist, Orwell, and a fierce critic of Stalin and his “cult of personality,” his style of dictatorship; though it was disguised—to the cheers of many European intellectuals—as enlightened, democratic, sun to the nations kind of a regime. Indeed, I propose to you here that all dictators, and all dictatorships, no matter their names and disguises, are inherently the same, and operate according to the same set of rules. Autocratic by nature, they are all alike: From Napoleon (the name of chief pig on the farm) to Hitler and Stalin. No wonder Putin helped Trump win the election.

Now hang on a minute, before you accuse me of jumping the gun here. Trump won the election democratically, you say, fair and square. (BTY: So did Hitler.) Now let’s see how democratically was it, really, and how fair and square. First, while Trump won the electoral collage, Hillary won the popular vote. What kind of a (rigged) democracy is that? Here are some stats: America, by land area, voted 85% Trump, 15% Hillary; by population, Hillary won 54% to 46%, or even by a wider margin, as by now (and counting) Hillary has more than two million votes over Trump. A democracy, you say? Second: The Russians interfered directly in our election by hacking into the DNC, and by illegally spreading that damaging information through WikiLeaks, and otherwise through a sophisticated operation of fake news online (even Facebook apparently got into the act), and now we hear that they might have interfered with the results of the election in three crucial states as well. The FBI, for its part, first joined forces with the Russians by refusing to disclose their attempts to sabotage our “free” election (and probably by not taking them seriously in the first place), and second by the action of the head of the FBI himself, James Comey, who interfered in the election, and had stopped the momentum of Hillary Clinton’s campaign on its tracks, saying he’s reopening the investigation into her “emails affair,” and a week later saying he’s not. You call that democracy? You call that fair and square?

I don’t. But wait: there’s more. Almost every TV network, every newspaper, every social media outlet would gladly tell you that Hillary Clinton is the fifth major candidate in history to win the popular vote in an American election, and lose the election. But guess what, none of them would ever tell you—why, exactly?—which party these losing candidates were leading: Democratic Party or Republican Party. It drove me nuts, so I did my own research on the matter. And guess what: All five candidates who ultimately lost the election, after winning the popular vote, were leading the Democratic Party. (An exception could be made only for the first one, Andrew Jackson, but not really, because after all he was a democrat, and created the party because the election was stolen from him due to a “corrupt bargain.”) So is that a democracy?

I say NO! I say it is a rigged system, par excellence, designed to favor the Republican Party every step of the way. Just as the Republicans did some major redistricting throughout the land in order to assure them control over the Congress for many years to come. While the majority of the American people have voted for the Democratic Candidate, and are leaning towards the Democratic Party, the Republicans will now have the power in the White House, the Congress, and the Supreme Court. What kind of a s system is that? A broken system, my friends, that what it is. For all these reasons and more, too numerous to count here—not the least among them is the character of the “chief pig on the farm,” who is a bigot, a sexist, and a racist, whose first appointment was of a white supremacist (who reportedly had refused to send his kids to school with Jewish kids) as his “Minister of Propaganda”—we must reject the notion of the appeasers. He is not our leader. The system is rigged against us. Therefore—democratically, civilly and disobediently, in the courts and in the streets—we must resist!

* The “Leave a Comment” link is the last tag below, in blue.

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. Take a deep breath, Hillel.
    I didn’t get very far on this, as your math seems to be even worse than your political analysis. The two candidates are separated currently by less than 2% in the (irrelevant by law and practice) popular vote, not the false margin of 8% that you report.

  2. YASHER KOACH!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: