• Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    E. Friesen on Scoop of the Year: Proof of a…
    Hillel Damron on Scoop of the Year: Proof of a…
    Erika Friesen on Scoop of the Year: Proof of a…
    Goose on The Price of Victory
    Judah Rosen on The Colonel and the Sheph…
  • Top Posts

  • Search by Category

  • Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 12,089 hits
  • Pages

  • Twitter

  • Meta

  • Advertisements

Evolution not Revolution



There are eight reasons out of ten for me to like Bernie Sanders, vote for him, and recommend him to be our next president. And yet – I will vote for Hillary Clinton. Here’s why: While I feel the burn/bern of revolution still inside me; and while it fondly reminds me of my younger years, when I was rebel, with or without a cause; unfortunately, I don’t believe in revolutions any longer. I believe in evolutions. Even the French revolution had failed, to the greater degree. And Obama’s revolution, too. Remember “Yes we can!” (i.e. Feel the Bern!) We are all Americans; no blacks or whites; male or females; democrats or republicans. Etc. We will unite, in Washington and elsewhere. I voted for him twice, and I’m proud of it still. But this revolution failed miserably. And at least on this score, things are worse now than when Obama took office.

Yes, he did object to the war in Iraq, and so did Sanders (and so did yours truly). And he did bring our troops home, largely, if not entirely; especially not in Afghanistan. Indeed, I do trust Sanders more than any other candidate not to go head first into any foolish war again. As well, he might be the only candidate, regarding Israel, who will be able to cut Netanyahu down to size, and will not be afraid to stand up to the AIPAC-Adelson-Republican coalition, where even Obama – except on the Iran Nuclear Deal issue – has failed to live up to expectations. Hillary, as secretary of state, did give Netanyahu hell once. And to her credit even tried, though naturally failed, to negotiate a Two-State solution. But if elected, she might appoint someone named Bill Clinton to be her emissary to the Middle East, and maybe – just maybe – will finally bring a livable, even if not peaceful, resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I trust his chances better than anybody else on the planet in this regard.

I like that Bernie is older than me, and that his honesty and fiery rhetoric appeal to young people. And I like that he is Jewish, at least by birth and heritage, if not by practice. I don’t mind that he is an atheist, not at all, though for myself the definition of secular humanist will fit better. Unlike him, I am a member of a Jewish congregation, and at least observe and celebrate the Jewish Holidays. But I’ll give him a pass on that. And I like also that he’s defining himself as a Socialist Democrat. As I’ve defined myself for many years, since leaving the “socialist” kibbutz where I was born and grew up (and where, in a different kibbutz though, Sanders “lived the experience” for a couple of months). But I don’t believe a European Socialist Democracy will work here in America. Even more so, it has no chance whatsoever of ever becoming a reality. It’s a pie in the sky.

Furthermore: According to well-regarded economy scholars, if implemented, together with his tax and free collage plans, he will bring some 30 trillion-dollar deficit to out treasury. Topping even the three leading Republicans irresponsible economic plans. Staunch liberals such as Nobel Prize winner in economics Paul Krugman in the NY Times thinks so, too. “I… point out that this is a pretty big deal: Four former Democratic chairs of the Council of Economic Advisers have put out a letter warning that Bernie Sanders’s economic program contains a very worrisome amount of voodoo,” he wrote. He further cited Austan Goolsbee, formerly chairman of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, now at the University of Chicago, as saying that Sanders economic “evolved into magic flying puppies with winning Lotto tickets tied to their collars.”

Yes, young people like to believe that if only they will bring down Wall Street, everything will be all right. (I suppose that the “Occupy Wall Street” movement ignited Sanders idea of running for presidency.) Free collage education – check. Single health care system – check. But I rather stick with Obamacare. It is his single most important internal achievement – to which, by the way, Hillary had put the groundwork – and it took a major fight to bring it about. (The battle not over yet, mind you.) It is proving economically viable, and helps millions of people get the healthcare they need. I trust Hillary to “move the football forward,” and improve on it.

I like that Sanders is not overly religious. It’s about time we extract religiosity – God help America and all that – from our political life and our leaders. And I have to admit, come to think of it, that I don’t remember Hillary mentioning God too often herself. Fits me. Like her husband, she’s too cleaver for that. And yes, I like that she is a woman. About time we have a woman president. It might improve a lot of things here. Bring much-needed progress to the workplace. Especially, I like her stand on the proliferation of guns in America. And dislike Sanders position on the matter. I dare say that for me, it is the single most important issue of all. With Hillary in the White House, maybe there are chances for better gun control laws.

And so, with Hillary can-do pragmatism and experience, both on foreign affairs and internal affairs, we at least get someone tasted, with scars to boot, but with a much better chance than Sanders of getting things done. Of moving the Republicans in Congress a step or two closer to reality, and towards sanity. And remember, come hell or high water, she has Bill on her side. That’s two presidents on one ticket. It’s a double-show. So for these reasons, and despite my affinity with Bernie Sanders’ personality and message, this blogger has supported, and now endorsing, Hillary Clinton as the Democratic candidate for President.

* The “Leave a comment” link is the last tag below, in blue.

4 Responses

  1. You are a man of great influence. A widely respected author. Have you sold out to the establishment? How much did she promise you for this endorsement? Was it a ticket to the convention? Can you get 2 tickets? Or else I’m writing in my own name on the ballot………….

  2. Sounds pretty much like my thinking:
    Bernie espouses really intriguing ideas that have very little chance of getting through even a post-elecltion congress.
    Hillary stikes me as very pragmatic with a sold core of values that can work for the U.S. (Equal pay for Equal work, Reasonable gun Control etc.)

  3. Hi Hillel, Thanks for your always insightful commentary. Your title reminds me of another similar one that has never outlived its controversy, and with it social media’s fantasy of the worst that could happen. Palestine: Peace not Apartheid was condemned for using the A word as though it was the originator of the concept in the perverse mind of the P community. And the author, trying to caution the P’s to choose peace, ran into the entire offensive/defensive Jewish community as though he was one of them. Jimmy Carter, my nominee for peace maker, may ironically be qualified by that very negative American press that separates him just enough to allow the P’s to trust him at the table. Bill Clinton, on the other hand, has too much American baggage to be trusted. And besides, he is too glib to be taken seriously by the P’s. I hope you are not accused of invoking a revolution just because you used the word. I remember my rabbi offering to trade me a book for Carter’s. He said that he would not spend a nickel on Carter’s book, all of this before he had read it, functioning only on the advice and consent of his conservative critics. I never did complete the transaction, and as far as I know, he still condemns Carter and still has not bought the book. As a longtime ally of Carter, I of course have had to sacrifice the friendships of some illiterate politicos, who unwittingly perhaps have set the stage for a qualified Carter to step into the foray and solve the problem. It’s a strange world that cannot decide “What’s good for the Jews.” Bernie Goldberg

  4. Agree almost totally

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: